Dustin Lang
2006-07-26 13:29:35 UTC
Hi,
To those on the "user" list: I've seen a couple of bug reports (even sent
one myself) about build failures with kernel 2.6.17.x relating to
Modules.symver, but no mention of the patch that was floating around on
the devel list:
http://lists.linux-wlan.com/pipermail/linux-wlan-devel/attachments/20060508/e25e690b/make-2.6.17.bin
To those on the "devel" list: I got a compile failure with 2.6.17.7 which
is fixed by the attached patch. I have no idea when that field of the
struct changed so I don't know if I'm checking the right kernel version,
but it Works For Me (tm). Sorry, I don't have time today to do it
right...
To all: is there sufficient traffic on these lists to justify two separate
lists (especially if things like patches don't diffuse from devel to
user). Personally, I wouldn't at all mind a merged list.
Cheers,
dstn.
To those on the "user" list: I've seen a couple of bug reports (even sent
one myself) about build failures with kernel 2.6.17.x relating to
Modules.symver, but no mention of the patch that was floating around on
the devel list:
http://lists.linux-wlan.com/pipermail/linux-wlan-devel/attachments/20060508/e25e690b/make-2.6.17.bin
To those on the "devel" list: I got a compile failure with 2.6.17.7 which
is fixed by the attached patch. I have no idea when that field of the
struct changed so I don't know if I'm checking the right kernel version,
but it Works For Me (tm). Sorry, I don't have time today to do it
right...
To all: is there sufficient traffic on these lists to justify two separate
lists (especially if things like patches don't diffuse from devel to
user). Personally, I wouldn't at all mind a merged list.
Cheers,
dstn.